TH!NK post

This article is archived. Comments are closed.

What clogged drains can teach us about sustainability

Published 13th November 2009 - 3 comments - 1423 views -

When we moved into our house in Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island almost 10 years ago the bathing facilities were limited to a tiny closet-sized room with blue shag carpeting that contained a bathtub with a shower-head that came out of the side of the bath. 

Taking a morning shower was a complicated soggy adventure.

And so the first major renovation we made to the house was to punch out the wall between this closet-bath and the actual closet beside it and create an expansive new washroom complete with snazzy (and expansive) shower room.

The new shower is wonderful, but it has one flaw: every couple of months the shower drain gets clogged up, resulting in a week or two of quick-before-the-shower-overflows showers until we get around to clearing the drain.

Our traditional practice in this regard has been to employ Draino or Liquid Plumr: chemical drain cleaners that, while they create a toxic death cloud in the washroom for a while, and require pouring corrosive chemicals down the drain and into the watershed, do an awfully good job of clearing the drain and allowing for a return to languid showers.

Last month the drain clogged up on schedule and I headed over to True Value hardware in the mall to buy some drain cleaner. Given my new-found interest in ecology, I decided to actually read the labels on the drain cleaners, and in doing so got shocked into looking for an alternative: I just couldn't conscience the idea of pouring that stuff down the drain. "What about the poor oysters?!" I said to myself.

Nature Clean Drain CleanerSo I returned home with bottle of Nature Clean Drain Cleaner, a product that said on the label it used "enzymes and highly active bacteria" instead of harsh chemicals to clear my drains.

The Nature Clean product worked. Eventually. While the chemical drain cleaners burn through the clogs in an hour or two, it took about 24 hours, two sessions, and some supplemental drain plunging to get the drain clear.  But in the end it was clear, and I was happy to have taken the additional effort.

But then I got to wondering: what exactly are "enzymes and highly active bacteria."  And is it any less dangerous to pour them down the drain than it is to pour potassium hydroxide down the drain?

So I did some research.  I consulted with my science writer and biophysicist friend Oliver who taught me about what an enzyme is, and how you whip them up.  I consulted with the folks at Nature Clean who wrote back:

Our Nature Clean Drain Cleaner is based on naturally occurring microrganism - bacteria spore concentrate in high numbers. When applied or poured in your drains these bacteria will come in contact with starches, carbohydrates, cellulose, fats, grease and oils and become activated (feeding) thereby producing enzymes - which will gradually break down organic blockage. So it does take longer and it is a very good drain/septic maintainer and completely safe.

And finally I sent a note to the City of Charlottetown's water and sewer department from which I received a thorough and very helpful reply about the relative merits of various drain cleaners.  What was most helpful, though, was their final suggestion:

The bigger question for me is why would you find it necessary to use such a product? Perhaps there is a problem in your plumbing system which is causing the flow to be obstructed. Is the plumbing that services the fixture visible? I wonder if there is a flat section or a section with reverse grade?

I'm embarrassed to say that it had never occurred to me to consider the issue from this perspective: I'd channeled all my efforts – and the time and energy of helpful others – into finding a better way to do the same old thing.  I never gave any consideration to whether the problem itself, and my approach to it, needed examination.

I thought of this last night when I sat in on the opening of the final session of the City of Charlottetown's Integrated Community Sustainability Plan process.

Making an "ICSP" is a weird process: rather than something that flowed naturally from a local desire for a more sustainable approach to city governance, it's part of a carrot-stick procedure required by the federal government for communities to be able to access money from the federal Gas Tax Fund.  Think of it as mandatory driver trainer for someone who's gotten into a car accident.  Except the "accident" is "not acting in a sustainable manner."

As is often the case with such exercises, an industry of ICSP consultants has emerged to help communities develop their plans, and last night's exercise was conducted by consultants from the multi-national firm Stantec that the City of Charlottetown has contracted to lead the ICSP development process.

Last night's session had all the elements from the modern consultancy toolkit: there were charts of the "pillars of sustainability," references to "stakeholders," videos of  a "green CEO" (from Stonyfield Yoghurt), sticky-notes all over the wall, and adhesive dots standing ready for what one participant referred to as "dot-mocracy."  There was even a time set aside at the beginning for "quiet reflection."

In other words, it had all the hallmarks of a charade, and none of the hallmarks of something that real people interested in real things might actually ever care about.  That the meeting was attended largely by politicians, public servants and advocacy groups only served to emphasize this.

Sustainability Sticky Notes

The fundamental issue, though: the ICSP exercise was focused on finding a better way to clear the drain clog, rather than stepping back and considering why the drain was getting clogged in the first place.

If I've learned anything from steeping myself in the 1970s for the past two weeks it's that sustainability is all about process, not product.

We know exactly what we need to do, technologically, to adjust our systems; the real challenge is the behaviour modification we need to go through to motivate ourselves to implement.  Installing solar panels and biomass-powered furnaces is easy; getting a community to the point where it thinks that's an important thing to think about is really, really hard.

If Charlottetown is truly concerned about building a sustainable community, the plan should not involve closeting a narrow bunch of "stakeholders" in meeting rooms with "experts" to ferret out whether federal cash should be used to buy more buses, build artist kiosks, or improve storm-sewer quality: that's simply trying to figure out how to run new programs on the same old operating system.

A truly sustainable community is one that considers how we plan as much as it considers what we're planning to do.

And, apparently, that's not an ingredient in the ICSP process: when I asked why all the sticky notes on the wall were about the what and not the how I was told that the "implementation plan" would include recommendations on that front: the consultants would write that up at the end of the process, and that it would be up to the City to figure out the rest.

So here's what's going to happen next: the consultants will write up their report and present it to the City and then pack up and go on to their next Gas Tax job.  The City will make a big show of how it's gone all sustainable; there will be a press conference, and an article in the newspaper with the Mayor holding the new plan.  The Gas Tax money will flow and the money will be spent on things that the City was already planning to spend the money on before this whole process got started.

And while some eco-friendly infrastructure tweaks may results, the community will be no more "sustainable" than when the exercise started.

I don't know what the path to a sustainable community looks like. 

I'm pretty sure it doesn't involve consultants and sticky notes and stakeholders, though.

I suspect it involves a lot of hard work: city councillors fanning out to have real conversations with constituents, hundreds of small meetings in neighbourhoods to talk about actual problems and solutions, work in the schools to involve all ages in developing plans and ideas. It will takes strong, informed, passionate leaders to get out in front of the process and point the way.  It will take a long time and won't involve a lot of money – qualities that take it outside the comfort zone of our traditional approach to planning – and a willingness to experiment with new ways of making plans, making decisions, and getting things done.

Sustainability isn't a snap-on feature that you can add to a community, it's an approach to living in community. 

Until we stop seeing a bunch of drains that need unclogging in every more inventive ways we're never going to get there.

We need to step back and open our minds to the possibility that the solution might lie in rearranging the plumbing: re-framing the problems, not banging harder on the solutions.

Cross-posted from ruk.ca.

Category: Climate Politics, | Tags: sustainability, sustainability, prince edward island, policy,



Comments

Adela on 13th November 2009:

This clogging seems to be quite a challenge. I think this is the reason most of the public toilets in my country display the following message: ‘Please throw used paper into the basket, not into the toilet’

May I ask what made you buy this specific ‘Nature Clean Drain Cleaner’ instead of another eco one?

Aija Vanaga on 13th November 2009:

This is a great post that put me to think about sustainable living and development. It is about process not product. That is so true!

Peter Rukavina on 15th November 2009:

Adela, I’ve seen the “Please throw used paper into the basket” sign in toilets here in Canada, especially in older buildings.  It’s rare, though.

Nature Clean was the only non-harsh-chemical drain cleaner on sale in my local hardware store, so it was the only choice I had wink

This article is archived. Comments are closed.