TH!NK post
This article is archived. Comments are closed.
Is personal cap-and-trade the answer?
Published 07th October 2009 - 6 comments - 923 views -
In May of this year the Environmental Audit Committee recommended that the government introduce a personal carbon trading scheme in Britain. As with cap-and-trade at the national level individuals would be provided with a personal carbon quota, and each time they bought goods, petrol or the like they would have to pay an allowance. Like the industry equivalent, if a person ran short of credit they would have the option of purchasing more from someone who hadn't used their quota. The idea being that a personal ration of carbon would force individuals to be actively conscious of their CO2 expenditure, and thus limit their usage. The fact that individuals could make money from selling on unused credits would also add a financial incentive to curbing usage.
At present however, the government is balking at the idea. This is largely because it would cost billions of pounds to implement (and we're in a financial crisis dontyaknow) but also because it lacks widespread support among the population. Nevertheless, the groundwork is being laid and there are suggestions that a scheme could be in place by 2020.
As someone trying to get a handle on my carbon footprint I would welcome such an initiative. It would help me understand where I'm unnecessarily burning credit (grapes flown in from Greece perhaps) and allow me to make informed decisions about what I do use it for. That said, I'm not sure I'm representative of the general population. How eagerly will the majority of people welcome enforced limits on the goods they can buy and the travel they can do? What government would be brave enough to introduce such a politically volatile scheme? And would such a scheme simply see the less well-off funding the carbon extravagances of the rich?
Comments
This article is archived. Comments are closed.
About the author
Related posts
- A retour Amsterdam-India, why not… by train?
- Possibility of climate change by pre-modern farmers?
- India changes stance to push for a global deal at Copenhagen
- My Conceptual Framework on Climate Change
- Black Point of the Danube Basin
- Climate Change, Energy and Environment in the Lisbon Treaty
- A Message from Romanian Cyclists for Leaders in Copenhagen
Popular posts
- TCKTCK: Got only 10 years to save ourselves!
- Denmark cries in Sea of Blood, 950 Whales and Dolphins KILLED…
- Micro pigs - the ultimate sweetheart energy saver
- If you want to see nude people click here
- Do we really care about our planet? Think twice before answering.
- Bunnies for fuels: not a good story to share in a grade school classroom
- Evolutions in the history of Environment Part 2


The main problem is that at the moment there is no ISO standard on carbon labelling yet. It is scheduled to be completed by 2011.
You are right to pinpoint the UK government as the leader on this issue. Some good thinking there! France on the other hand is more pro-active on carbon reporting (companies reporting their carbon footprint) & is planning to put legal requirements in place.
The overhead the government has to pay for a personal cap and trade scheme and the additional transaction costs it carries for consumers make it a lot less efficient than a carbon tax (as is being implemented in France and thought about in the EU) or a cap and trade scheme that is located further ‘upstream’ in the supply chain.
That said, it could have interesting effects on awareness.
If one sets up a market of carbon it should be done on all Europe!
Great said !
I don’t think that it is best answer because trading is not that simple..
That is what I said!