TCKTCK: Got only 10 years to save ourselves!
Published 26th November 2009 - 22 comments - 127571 views -
Motto: "According to a new U.N. report, the global warming outlook is much worse than originally predicted. Which is pretty bad when they originally predicted it would destroy the planet." (Jay Leno)
London (Westminster) in 2020 A.D. - according to James Lovelock
A friend in need is a friend indeed. Just days after Climategate one of Michael Mann's accomplices (Schneider) hurried to publish a report, which "confirms, the AGW science" and says, that "IPCC was really wrong... it underestimated the climatechange." http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/nov/25/copenhagen-diagnosis-ipcc-science
I don't think we should worry about the integrity of Schneider's working methods. They can be trusted... to use the same high standards of work as Jones and Mann.
As I wrote before (http://climatechange.thinkaboutit.eu/think2/post/how_to_talk_to_a_skeptic_hansens_prediction), IPCC did not expect the present cooling. Warming stopped/halted in 1998. This logically means that they should lower the estimates of future temperatures. They apparently overestimated the influence of CO2 on temperatures.
Surprisingly we see the exact opposite. The alarmists INCREASED their estimates of CO2 forcing on temperatures:
- We are being told, that global warming will come already by 2060 (not 2100) and it will be a sudden shock jump by 4°C upwards (in some regions even more). Said by Richard Betts from Met Off at an international conference in Oxford in September 2009. (http://www.24dash.com/news/Environment/2009-09-28-Met-Office-Global-temperatures-to-rise-4C-by-2060).
- Dr . James Lovelock ( the creator of the Gaia Hypothesis) wrote in November 2007 edition of the Rolling Stone magazine, that humans will be nearly extinct by the year 2100. "By 2020, droughts and other extreme weather will be commonplace. By 2040, the Sahara will be moving into Europe, and Berlin will be as hot as Baghdad"
- Good thing is that they invented "a tipping point". It is a sort of miracle - thought we do not observe any disastrous trends now, they may appear all of a sudden with terrible force. Which is very convenient, because you can predict just anything, although there are no signs of it observed.
- Although warming stopped/halted/paused, we hear, it is "accelerating". Unbelievable lies (in 2009). Disgusting. (for instance: http://www.planetark.com/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/36521/story.htm)
- We have less than 10 years to save ourselves. "Delaying concerted global efforts to tackle climate change by ten years would make it “virtually impossible” to keep global warming below 2 degrees Celsius, according to a report published by the management consultancy McKinsey." Written in 2009. (http://www.europeanvoice.com/article/2009/01/climate-s-tipping-point-is-2020-mckinsey/63740.aspx)
- IPCC (a political committee of UNO) predicts, that CO2 emissions must peak and start falling by 2020 or we are doomed due to warming. By 2020 we should get the CO2 emissions to where they were in 1990. Rajendra Pachauri, the chairman of the IPCC, said that 2015 is the last year in which the world could afford a net rise in greenhouse gas emissions, after which "very sharp reductions" are required... And 2020 is practically tomorrow.
THESE RISING PREDICTIONS ARE BASED ON... WHAT EXACTLY?
How can we explain this absurdity? Temperatures proved to be less sensitive to CO2 than expected. And yet the IPCC conclude the exact opposite and correct their predictions to INCREASE the estimated CO2 forcing. This eludes all logic.
Alarmists are getting hysterical. Their beloved warming is over. What if it does not resume? (Graph from: http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/ )
The predictions are all conditional clauses (If-clauses).
- IF CO2 has strong forcing ont emperature--> Warming will be strong.
- IF CO2 causes appearance of ghosts and dragons--> Carbon dioxide emissions will lead to an increase in supernatural phenomena.
It is all based on fictional models and speculations. Nobody knows, how strong the CO2 forcing is. IPCC itself gradually lowered the expected maximum forcing from the doubling of carbon dioxide from cca 1,5- 4,5°C to cca 1,5-3,5°C. By almost one third. They do not have a clue.
And Stephen Schneider? The autor of the latest "cofirmation that Climategate does not change the basic science of AGW"?
In 1971 (when he forecasted global cooling) Schneider claimed that an 800% increase in CO2 would be needed to raise global temperature by +2 deg. By the late 1980s, he promoted the UN view that a mere 100% increase in CO2 would be enough to raise temperature by +1.5 to +4 deg.
Schneider S. & Rasool S., "Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and Aerosols - Effects of Large Increases on Global Climate", Science, vol.173, 9 July 1971, p.138-141. Available at http://www.john-daly.com/schneidr.htm
And according to the latest alarmist prophecies we will have some 6°C warming already in 2060s. Long before the doubling of the CO2 levels.
Conclusion: They are just pulling the numbers from their sleeve.
WHAT IS ENDANGERED - CLIMATE OR ALARMISTS?*
*(I am paraphrasing the title of Vaclav Klaus book "Blue Planet in Green Shackles - What is endangered, climate or freedom?)
The only explanation is sociologic, political and psychological. It seems, that the climatic alarmists are losing their nerves.
- First, their Copenhagen "deal" is slowly vanishing like water vapour.
- Second, we skeptics managed to sneak into this little tcktcktck propagandist event and turn it into dust by exposing the weak spots of environmentalism. Such as Eamon's article on Climategate.
- Third, nobody takes their "warming" predictions seriously any more, because we all can see, that global temperatures are not higher than in 1998. Although CO2 levels jumped up by 30% in the last decade, the temperatures refuse to go up. So much for the CO2 feedback forcing... The warming perhaps might resume again. Who knows. But the alarmists are very nervous about this cooling.
2020: A RACE AGAINST TIME
Why are they becoming so hysterical? Making panicking predictions?
The alarmists are not afraid of global warming. They are afraid of global cooling. If the temperatures do not start rising again soon, they will lose their credibility, funding and jobs.
The only way to save their face is to DO SOMETHING NOW and then pretend, that the COOLING IS THANKS TO THEIR MEASURES.
Then Al Gore comes: "We lowered CO2 dioxide and look - the warming stopped. We saved you."
But it is a race against time. If they do not achieve this by 2020, they will be discredited. So the Copenhagen conference is their LAST CHANCE. Either they make up some "ambitious" new Kyoto Protocol, or they are doomed.
Their future is gloomy. So far they achieved no net CO2 decrease. The Kyoto Protocol was a failure. The scientists from the network Global Carbon Project found out, that between years 2000 and 2008 the global CO2 emissions increased by 29 percent." (http://www.novinky.cz/veda-skoly/184631-zemi-hrozi-otepleni-o-sest-stupnu-celsia.html). And as the Copenhagen Deal slowly crumbles, there is little hope, that any net CO2 decrease will come in the next decade.
INCOMPETENT CO2 - I WILL DO IT MYSELF: Al Gore melting the icebergs manually. This warming really is manmade.
BULLSHIT ARMS RACE
"To capture the public imagination, we have to offer up some scary scenarios, make simplified dramatic statements and little mention of any doubts one might have. Each of us has to decide the right balance between being effective, and being honest." (Leading greenhouse advocate, Dr Stephen Schneider( in interview for "Discover" magazine, Oct 1989)
OK, Stephen. But people finally get used to anything - it is like with drugs, you have to increase the dosage as the body adapts to it. So then you need to escalate your dramatic predictions to capture the public imagination again. And in the end you end up with completely unrealistic doomsday rubbish. Too much is too much.
SEE YOU IN HELL
We will see soon, who was right. The Judgment Day is coming.
To use the terminology of IPCC, it is "very likely" , that the climate change alarmism will freeze to death by 2020s.
And the whole AGW movement will be ridiculed for the rest of human history.
I hope the above described spasm of alarmist hysteria is the last outcry of a dying body of the slimy green monster, that has been scaring us and our children so long.
Rest in Greenpeace.
About the author
- Junk science: Compare IPCC predictions 20 years later
- Global warming was cancelled. Go home.
- This cooling is just a masked warming
- TCKTCK: Got only 10 years to save ourselves!
- Denmark cries in Sea of Blood, 950 Whales and Dolphins KILLED…
- Micro pigs - the ultimate sweetheart energy saver
- If you want to see nude people click here
- Do we really care about our planet? Think twice before answering.
- Evolutions in the history of Environment Part 2
- Bunnies for fuels: not a good story to share in a grade school classroom