Post

When green energy becomes the target of shady deals

Published 01st November 2009 - 10 comments - 842 views -

As I described in a previous post, Iceland has an abundance of green energy. And as we know, green energy is the energy of the future – and will only get more valuable with time. Consequently it is not surprising that Iceland’s green resources are already the target of a power struggle aimed at transferring control of those resources from the public domain into the hands of private individuals.

Last year, when Iceland’s economy melted down, a can of worms was opened up that showed the extent of the corruption and cronyism that has existed in this country for decades but which had been hidden or overlooked by most people.

Much of this corruption had been propagated by the political party that had been in power for decades – the Independence Party. Not only had the IP governed in parliament, but it had also installed its members in key positions in Icelandic society, including the judiciary, the government ministries and the banks. The Independence Party is the party responsible for implementing free-market capitalism in Iceland, a la Thatcher in the UK and Reagan in the USA. One of the hallmarks of their policy was large-scale privatization – which primarily meant selling off valuable public assets to friends or associates of the party.

Iceland’s economic collapse was largely caused by a handful of individuals who had amassed great amounts of wealth, frequently with help from the political sector. Driven by greed, poor judgment and a penchant for taking large-scale risks, these few individuals drove the Icelandic nation to the edge of bankruptcy.

But they could spot opportunity when they saw it. So a few years ago, a number of those investors turned their attention to Iceland’s geothermal energy sources, which at the time were owned collectively by the Icelandic nation.

Geysir Green Energy website picture

In 2007, the Icelandic government – headed by the Independence Party – decided to sell its share in one of the country’s geothermal power companies, HS Orka [HS Energy]. The company provides energy for the Reykjanes peninsula in the southwest of Iceland, a stone’s throw from the capital Reykjavík. For anyone who has been to Iceland, it is the place on which the Keflavík international airport is located, and spans the stretch of road you drive through to get to the capital.

Curiously, one of the conditions that the IP set for the HS Orka sale was that only private parties could bid for it – other public energy companies, or companies in the public sector, were excluded. The share was sold to a company called Geysir Green Energy, which had been expressly set up for the purpose of investing in power companies and which was headed by a handful of ultra-slick investors.

Geysir Green Energy was a subsidiary of another company called FL Group, which holds the dubious honor of recording one of the most massive losses in Iceland’s history – and that was even before everything collapsed. What we, the Icelandic public, did not know, was that FL Group had paid a large bribe grant to the Independence Party at the end of December 2006. Two days later, on 1 January 2007, laws took effect that prohibited grants of that size to political parties. In other words, FL Group snuggled up to the IP just in time to secure its green-energy interests. Two months later, the coalition government of the IP and the Progressive Party sold its 32% share in HS Orka to Geysir Green Energy.

Fast-forward to this past summer when the town of Reykjanesbær – the local authority responsible for HS Orka – decided to sell its share in the company to Geysir Green Energy. Reykjanesbær is an Independence Party stronghold and the party holds a majority in the town council. Thus it should come as no surprise that the plans for the sale were neither announced publicly nor was the sale advertised – in other words, Geysir Green Energy was hand-picked as a buyer.

The terms of that sale are pretty much impenetrable for a normal person to understand – they are that complicated. However, it has the whiff of corruption all over it. The value of the share owned by Reykjanesbær was assessed in December 2008 at ISK 14.3 billion – however, approximately six months later the town decided to sell its share to Geysir Green for ISK 13.1 billion – ISK 1.2 billion lower than the value of the share.

One of the components of the deal was that Reykjanesbær sold valuable land, containing geothermal energy fields, to HS Orka – resources that, with the sale, effectively fell into the hands of private individuals. While Reykjanesbær owned the land, the nearby town of Grindavík owned the planning rights, and in an effort to stop the sale, Grindavík tried to make a bid for the land – but was purposely kept away from the table until the sale was completed. Meanwhile, the minority in the Reykjanesbær town council harshly criticized the IP-led majority for negotiating the entire Geysir Green deal behind closed doors.

The scary thing in all this, of course, is that when private individuals gain control of such basic fundamental services as public utilities, the interests of those the company is set up to serve – the general public – start to take a back seat to the interests of the shareholders. Maintenance of infrastructure generally declines while prices go up. There are innumerable stories of this happening worldwide, as can be gleaned from the comments beneath this post, which I wrote on my blog. And when such shady dealings are employed to get these public utilities into private hands, it’s pretty much a given that the ensuing developments will not be good.

In the end, 66.7 percent of HS Orka had fallen into the hands of the private individuals behind Geysir Green Energy. However, this was just the beginning. More on that in the next post.

[Image a screen shot of the GGE website, shamelessly filched from here.]


Comments

  • paulstpancras on 01st November 2009:

    Time perhaps for the new government to nationalise all geo-thermal companies and compulsory acquire all geo-thermal sites in Iceland. This could be done under emergency powers due to the fiscal crisis. In 5 or 10 years, the companies could then be auctioned to the highest bidders.

  • Paul Montariol on 01st November 2009:

    I hope your country develop high temperature geothermal energy. Its difficult but we need it for the world. We have just a little one in Guadeloupe named “la bouillante”.

  • Alexander E on 01st November 2009:

    Neither “privatization” nor “nationalization” are bad or good. They are just forms of ownership.
    And public ownership is not a universal remedy neither guarantee of anything for several reasons. Same is true for “private” ownership.
    Two extreme examples of both evils - USSR and Iceland grin

    I th!nk unless there is a system of control that keeps the balance of the rights of all parties involved - both public and private - we’ll continue to step in one mess or another….

  • Alexander E on 01st November 2009:

    Paul Montariol

    I hope your country develop high temperature geothermal energy. Its difficult but we need it for the world.

    Paul. Most of energy in Iceland - electricity, heat, hot water - is geothermal. I think Iceland is really a world leader and Number 1 in this respect.
    the problem Alda is talking about - who will get all benefits from that? The whole nation or just a “lucky” few?

  • Easy on 02nd November 2009:

    The problem is that with the tax they are putting to electricity in Iceland not much is going to happen, allready 2 project have been put on hold because of this, one is this project of big compannies having their servers moved to iceland and the other is about this nev telecomunications cabel from america to Iceland, Iceland is in such a condittion that they have to tax everyting and raise taxes, and the first thing they are raising tax on is electricity(clever?). hope this site is not moderated by Alda, since every comment that is not possitive towards Iceland or Icelanders is consored in her blog.

  • Joerg on 02nd November 2009:

    According to statice.is, the most important source of energy in Iceland is hydropower. Even though constructions like the Kárahnjukar dam are most detrimental to the environment (and the economy), this is often misleadingly also whitewashed as “green energy”, which is particularly annoying, if this energy is given away at bargain prices for something completely unsustainable such as aluminium smelters.

    In the current economic situation many Icelanders may be very susceptible to dubious promises of job creation. This is certainly an optimal breeding ground for shady deals and unscrupulous gamblers, whereas in reality the best jobs are created just for those politicians, who didn’t have any shame to further the interests of the multinational companies, which prey on the Icelandic resources.

    But the spin is already in full swing, given the fishy details of the deal, in which HS Orka has been sold to the Canadian investor Magma Energy.

    And although a majority of residents of Hafnarfjörður had voted against the extension of the neighbouring Alcan aluminium smelter just two years ago, the supporters of this project are back, trying to exploit the weakness of the Icelandic economy for their purpose. They have been successful in having a petition signed to repeat this vote.

  • Alda Sigmundsdottir on 02nd November 2009:

    Easy - if what you claim were true, then most of your comments on my blog would have been deleted.

    The fact that you choose this particular forum to voice such a petty, ill-natured complaint gives a pretty good idea of why some of your comments don’t make it past moderation on my blog.

  • Easy on 02nd November 2009:

    @Alda- This very same comment that I posted on this page, didn’t pass through your moderation on your blog, I don’t think it’s a “petty, ill-natured complaint” it is very valid comment, and other bloggers have commented the same, anyway, peace. It’s just about everybody beeing able to express themselves regardless of their opinions not beeing compatible with ours, keep up the good work you are an exellent writer.

  • kevin oconnor waterford ireland on 02nd November 2009:

    @Easy All I can say is that Alda has allows let even my insane ramblings onto her blog so far as I can see ,As to the issue at hand.The whole thing seems to revolve around the goodies being passed into the hands of the few as part of the privatisation malarky, sometimes its good to privatise if it gets competition to help the consumer but other times its bad ie ask the British what they think of the highly successful sale of their state railways,water,power and gas and I think you will find that they have been sold a right pup. Even if you did agree with privatisation maybe its being given away for a song from one “friend” to another.

  • g bjarni on 03rd November 2009:

    I must say that my beloved Iceland
    is no different then usa/uk
    in fiscal responsibility
    (Bush/Reagan/Thatcher)
    privatize profit
    socialize private debt

    who gets left holding the bag of debt
    you and me
    the ones who have an average wage of
    $18 per hour(usa)
    private jets for the few
    buses for the many
    crowded apartment complexes
    private secluded McMansions

    and so it goes
    generation to generation
    deep in debt

    Am truly sorry Iceland
    sold its soul

    its time to
    INDICT INDICT INDICT

    PEACE

Comments

  • Remember my personal information

    Notify me of follow-up comments?

    --- Let's see if you are human ---

    Mel Gibson, is he a car mechanic or an actor? Add a questionmark to your answer. (6 character(s) required)

[close]