It is really funny, how the climategate deniers try to reaffirm their shaken beliefs.
1) Today also in some regions it is hotter and in some not. Just like in MWP. In USA it is less hot now than in 1930s. Other regions of the world are hotter than in 1930s.
2) The studies supporting hockeystick were all written by the same one-Mann team. Go and see RealClimate. Read Copenhagen Diagnosis.
3) You cannot call a small team of 50-100 friends a worldwide consensus.
4) Nobody knows how big the CO2 forcing is.It may be 1°C or 0.2°C. There is no evidence from the past, that CO2 can drive temperatures (ice-cores). In the last 10 years CO2 rising but temperatures not. IPCC models unable to explain it. And it is a travesty they cannot.
Climategate is a time, when greens have to decide. Either listen to reason and change their beliefs about climate change. Or throw reason off board and lock themselves into a fictional world of denial.
Comments
Great visualisation! I love it
The Information is Beautiful website has the full sized version that’s much easier to follow and read.
Unfortunately, if I’d put that here, I would have completely screwed the column format - so had to work with the dimensions.
This is the first graphic I see that eliminates all the fluff and sticks to facts.
It is really funny, how the climategate deniers try to reaffirm their shaken beliefs.
1) Today also in some regions it is hotter and in some not. Just like in MWP. In USA it is less hot now than in 1930s. Other regions of the world are hotter than in 1930s.
2) The studies supporting hockeystick were all written by the same one-Mann team. Go and see RealClimate. Read Copenhagen Diagnosis.
3) You cannot call a small team of 50-100 friends a worldwide consensus.
4) Nobody knows how big the CO2 forcing is.It may be 1°C or 0.2°C. There is no evidence from the past, that CO2 can drive temperatures (ice-cores). In the last 10 years CO2 rising but temperatures not. IPCC models unable to explain it. And it is a travesty they cannot.
Climategate is a time, when greens have to decide. Either listen to reason and change their beliefs about climate change. Or throw reason off board and lock themselves into a fictional world of denial.